Rewrite copy for a different audience or tone
The side-by-side diff makes it easy to spot where Claude over-edited.
by @whitney · recommended tool Claude · 0 unlocks
0
EXAMPLES · WHAT THIS PROMPT PRODUCES
Sample output
Rewritten for **busy primary-care physicians** in a **direct, evidence-first** voice. | Original | Rewrite | Rationale | |---|---|---| | "Unlock a new era of wellness with our revolutionary supplement blend." | "This formulation targets three measurable markers of metabolic health." | Swapped hype for a clinical claim physicians can evaluate. | | "Our holistic approach nourishes your body, mind, and spirit." | "Each dose delivers 400mg magnesium glycinate and 2g omega-3, dosed to published trial ranges." | Replaced vague wellness language with specifics a clinician needs. | | "Feel amazing every single day, naturally!" | "In a 12-week study, 68% of participants reported improved sleep latency." | Traded an emotional promise for a citable outcome. | | "Thousands of happy customers can't be wrong." | "Reviewed by a board-certified endocrinologist; ingredient sourcing is third-party tested." | Shifted social proof from volume to credibility signals physicians trust. | | "Try it risk-free today and transform your life!" | "Request a sample and the full ingredient panel for your own review." | Reframed CTA around professional evaluation, not consumer urgency. | **Preserved:** the core claims (metabolic support, sleep, ingredient quality), the section order, and the headline trial stat. **Note:** Original emotional intensity was intentionally lowered; if this targets a clinician newsletter, that read is correct. If repurposing for patients, restore warmth in the closing line.
PRICE HISTORY0 cr · current
PROMPT TEMPLATE · v1.0.0
Rewrite the attached copy for <NEW_AUDIENCE> in a <NEW_TONE> voice. Preserve: core claims, structure, key stats. Change: vocabulary level, examples, references. Return a side-by-side diff (original → rewrite) with a one-line rationale per change.
RESULTS · WHAT PEOPLE GOT
0Sign in to show colleagues what this case produced.
No results posted yet. Used this case? Show colleagues what it produced.
DISCUSSION
0 commentsSign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet — be the first.
MORE LIKE THIS